Axehole

Every Friday at Axehole, we bring the strangest story in music of the week….the one thing that really makes you wonder “WTF?”

We’ve brought you How to Microwave an iPod; a sound library that, even when it is beautiful, is disturbing; and yes, even a porn-soaked carnal exploration.

Regulars may be wondering “WTF?” because it’s Monday and we still don’t have Friday’s WTF Friday item up yet. Lucky for us, Britney Spears came to the rescue with her own porn-soaked carnal exploration.

It’s true - the Britney Spears - Kevin Federline fiasco continues, with reports that Spears made a four-hour sex tape and that K-Fed is threatening to sell it for Internet distribution unless she gives into his demands.

We won’t comment on the idea of a four-hour sex tape - that would take more stamina than we can muster…..

However, we have to wonder if it features:

A). Hot Britney:

Or
B). “I’m pregnant and I’ve boobs out to here” Britney:

K-Fed reportedly has been offered $50 million for the tape - so our money’s on A). Hot Britney.

A judge in Los Angeles last week threw out a Spears lawsuit against Us Weekly, ruling that Spears cannot be defamed by the magazine for publishing rumors that she and Federline had made a sex tape and were worried about its release.

Superior Court Judge Lisa Hart Cole said Spears has “put her modern sexuality squarely, and profitably, before the public eye” and it would be unlikely for the magazine article to be found defamatory.

“The issue is whether it is defamatory to state that a husband and wife taped themselves engaging in consensual sex,” wrote Cole in the decision. “The backdrop against which this issue must be addressed is that the plaintiff has publicly portrayed herself in a sexual way in her performances, in published photographs and in a reality show.”via CBS News